U.S. vessels to be armed near Horn of Africa ('bout time)

p06 17942093 300x176 U.S. vessels to be armed near Horn of Africa ('bout time)Planning on taking a trip around the Horn of Africa on a U.S. vessel anytime soon? Well if so (and I don’t know anyone other than maybe David Axe who would) you should expect to see a new surge of regulations imposed on these vessels by the U.S. Coast Guard. According to a Reuters story the USCG has enacted rules stating that vessels will now be required to have an approved security plan for the area and have a plan for posting guards; though it is up to the vessel owners if these guards will be armed (and why wouldn’t they be?) or not.

On Monday a revised Maritime Security Directive, highly anticipated by the shipping industry, was signed by ADM Allen. This is the second revision of said directive since it’s inception with the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2004. According to the Coast Guard press release from yesterday-

Vessel security plans for U.S. flagged vessels that operate in high risk waters must have security protocols for terrorism, piracy, and armed robbery against ships that meet the performance standards in this directive by May 25. An annex to the directive provides further specific measures required for vessels transiting in the Horn of Africa and Gulf of Aden high risk waters. All vessel security plans must be approved by the U.S. Coast Guard.

This is looking like a change that could have some serious repercussions for those in the piracy business. I hope the required guards are armed (and dangerous) as it wouldn’t make a whole lot of sense to post and unarmed century.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Dealing with Piracy… the Coast Guard's on it
  2. Statement by ADM Allen on piracy
  3. Admiral Allen on the Worlds Piracy Threat (and opinion)
  4. Can the Coast Guard (or U.S.) match Russia in the Arctic Domain?
  • The problem in the Gulf of Aden is one of identification, it is difficult to differentiate between fisherman and pirates. It is widely perceived by some in the security business however that the problem is a lack of willingness to get tough. The master is fully responsible for everything that happens aboard ship but it may be difficult to determine the degree of control the master has over a untrained, trigger happy security team which has little understanding of the situation.
blog comments powered by Disqus